[Ebook] ➠ The Myth of Nations: The Medieval Origins of Europe By Patrick J. Geary – Pimply.info

The Myth of Nations: The Medieval Origins of Europe Modern Day Europeans By The Millions Proudly Trace Back Their National Identities To The Celts, Franks, Gauls, Goths, Huns, Or Serbs Or Some Combination Of The Various Peoples Who Inhabited, Traversed, Or Pillaged Their Continent Than A Thousand Years Ago According To Patrick Geary, This Is Historical Nonsense The Idea That National Character Is Fixed For All Time In A Simpler, Distant Past Is Groundless, He Argues In This Unflinching Reconsideration Of European Nationhood Few Of The Peoples That Many Europeans Honor As Sharing Their Sense Of Nation Had Comparably Homogeneous Identities Even The Huns, He Points Out, Were Firmly United Only Under Attila S Ten Year ReignGeary Dismantles The Nationalist Myths About How The Nations Of Europe Were Born Through Rigorous Analysis Set In Lucid Prose, He Contrasts The Myths With The Actual History Of Europe S Transformation Between The Fourth And Ninth Centuries The Period Of Grand Migrations That Nationalists Hold Dear The Nationalist Sentiments Today Increasingly Taken For Granted In Europe Emerged, He Argues, Only In The Nineteenth Century Ironically, This Phenomenon Was Kept Alive Not Just By Responsive Populations But By Complicit ScholarsUltimately, Geary Concludes, The Actual Formation Of European Peoples Must Be Seen As An Extended Process That Began In Antiquity And Continues In The Present The Resulting Image Is A Challenge To Those Who Anchor Contemporary Antagonisms In Ancient Myths To Those Who Claim That Immigration And Tolerance Toward Minorities Despoil Nationhood As Geary Shows, Such Ideologues Whether Le Pens Who Champion The French People Born With The Baptism Of Clovis In Or Milosevics Who Cite Early Serbian History To Claim Rebellious Regions Know Their Myths But Not Their History The Myth Of Nations Will Be Intensely Debated By All Who Understood That A History That Does Not Change, That Reduces The Complexities Of Many Centuries To A Single, Eternal Moment, Isn T History At All Publishers Weekly


About the Author: Patrick J. Geary

Patrick J Geary is an American medieval historian and Professor of Western Medieval History at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey



10 thoughts on “The Myth of Nations: The Medieval Origins of Europe

  1. says:

    The book describes the genesis of different people in Europe and the related mythology used for justification the national states building in Europe the 19th century and beyond It is surprising how such a slim volume can summarise so many details It slightly rushes through the genesis of Slavic tribes, but for the rest it is impressive in its precision To demonstrate how the historiography affects and being affected by our convictions and


  2. says:

    The Myth of Nations is the third book in my trilogy of Late Antique histories, the first two being Frontiers of the Roman Empire and Barbarian Tides Unlike these titles, the current book is not an academic work Instead, Geary s audience is the general reader with an interest in history p 185 Beyond that, he wants to argue that modern national identities are the products of 18th and 19th century European state building In reality, identity w


  3. says:

    Patrick Geary s The Myth of Nations has only becomerelevant in the fifteen or so years since its first publication In this short, lucid, but highly thought provoking book, Geary explores how the period between the third and ninth centuries have been appropriated by nationalists and racists who claim to find in that period a definitive origin of contemporary European peoples Geary dismantles these myths and shows instead that the names of ethn


  4. says:

    I should start by saying I don t think this is a bad book I just find Geary s argument flawed, and as such disagree with his conclusion.In sum, Geary argues that the medieval territories that now comprise contemporary European nations did not view themselves as bound to each other, and consequently it is erroneous to speak of the nation of England or France, or Germany, or Greece during ancient and medieval time periods With the 18th century th


  5. says:

    Eigentlich ein sehr interessantes Thema und spannender Buchtitel Jedoch schweift der Autor an mehreren Stellen vom eigentlichen Thema ab So ist der Exkurs ber die Zulus fast g nzlich irrelevant Es werden viele Ans tze angeschnitten, jedoch nicht wirklich ausgef hrt Geary versucht den Nationalismus zu erkl ren und als ein falscher Grundsatz darstellen zu lassen Jedoch f hrt er seine Argumentationsstr nge nicht vollkommen zu ende und so verliert Ge


  6. says:

    Patrick Geary s Myth of Nations endeavors to prove that the national definitions of European nations are inaccurate due to the fluid nature of early European people groups Further he hopes to establish these definitions as political and racial in origin while shining a light on the role of historians in crafting this inaccurate narrative from the past This misinterpretation of the past, Geary postulates, has been co opted by nationalistic movements


  7. says:

    Ve ina re enica iz slede eg teksta je prepisana iz knjige Ja sam ih samo malo sredio kako bih dobio kompaktan tekst.Nacionalizam je tvorevina romantizma 19 veka u kombinaciji sa nau nom istorijom i indoevropskom filologijom Nema tu ni eg drevnog Pogleda na pro lost je zamagljen istorijskim istra ivanjima u poslednja dva veka Nacionalisti ke istorije se pre temelje na politi kim i kulturnim shvatanjima autora koji ih pi u nego na stvarnim injenicama.N


  8. says:

    I definitely liked it, and it pretty much shook my entire perception of peoplehood reading the brief section on the Bulgars and how they had split from the Avars is totally and utterly unlike anything I was taught in school in terms of the origins of the Bulgars Being Bulgarian, this really caused me to reconsider everything I was taught about our historical continuity as a people a concept which really is quite ridiculous Geary does a great job in des


  9. says:

    It s an obligatory classic for anyone taking a real interest in history I haven t read it in my undergrad years, as the Polish historiography has its own excellent classic title covering the same subject area see wit narod w europejskich Now, it pleases me to see that the English speaking world has also produced an accessible study on this subject It shows to a lay reader that the so called nations as we understand them today are relatively recent phenom


  10. says:

    Wonderful incisive look at the changing ideas of nationhood which disputes any idea of fixed national identities stemming from some distant past When contemporary nationalists appeal to history, their notion of history is static they look to the moment of primary acquisition, when their people, first arriving in the ruins of the Roman Empire, established their sacred territory and their national identity This is the very antithesis of history The history o


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *